April/May 2019 [ff - for a better understanding in a narrative-documentational flowing text way]:
-
-
Text: In this sense - thanks to the organizers.---[The End.]
In this sense - thanks to the organizers.
---
[The End.]
-
Text: Additional to that I want to call for it again, here in the "Dynamic Archive" or respectively want to indicate, that something will happen with that - form is motion. And I think the TDA is a first step into that direction, because I knew my compone
Additional to that I want to call for it again, here in the "Dynamic Archive" or respectively want to indicate, that something will happen with that - form is motion. And I think the TDA is a first step into that direction, because I knew my component "About the current Status of the Narrative Design/Designed Narratives" in a good place.
-
Text: The host of the podcast kindly hand over the raw-data record, with the edition that she or her podcast won't be named, because she still questions its valence. So I cut out her questions, comments etc. and shortend the time between the answers. Afte
The host of the podcast kindly hand over the raw-data record, with the edition that she or her podcast won't be named, because she still questions its valence. So I cut out her questions, comments etc. and shortend the time between the answers. After wall I added a DIN A2 poster wall chart to the interview, that illustrates the current status of the Narrative Design. But the important thing about the interview itself, I think, is my call at the end of it. [About minute 33:30]
-
Text: But - like I mentioned before - in April I noticed a certain congruence between my modified TDA-component text and some passages of the interview. Because of that - shortly told - I decided to divide my component into subcomponents and add the inter
But - like I mentioned before - in April I noticed a certain congruence between my modified TDA-component text and some passages of the interview. Because of that - shortly told - I decided to divide my component into subcomponents and add the interview as one of them to the text, as some kind of sidekick or opposite position. [sorry, just available in German, maybe someone will transcript it.]
-
Text: I had not a really good feeling during the recording about it. So I was not very surprised when the host was calling me shortly before Christmas. She told me she that she won't publish the interview, because she thought it was not good enough and to
I had not a really good feeling during the recording about it. So I was not very surprised when the host was calling me shortly before Christmas. She told me she that she won't publish the interview, because she thought it was not good enough and too vague. But nevertheless I was a little disappointed about it, but forgot the interview during the following months.
-
Text: Through that research I noticed a strong, presumably unconscious reference to a episode from December 2018. Before that I held my lecture "The Urigin of UR" [UR] about/with the eponymous work "UR". Through the documentation of it in the internet the
Through that research I noticed a strong, presumably unconscious reference to a episode from December 2018. Before that I held my lecture "The Urigin of UR" [UR] about/with the eponymous work "UR". Through the documentation of it in the internet the host of a podcast about "narrative theory" contacted me and asked me for an interview. So in the middle of December we've met and done the interview about me and my working methods.
-
Text: A satisfaction or congruence with the component respectively a reference to NG/GN as my favourite workstyle would not adjust. Because of that I disassembled my component-text into subcomponents.
A satisfaction or congruence with the component respectively a reference to NG/GN as my favourite workstyle would not adjust. Because of that I disassembled my component-text into subcomponents.