Text: Where is the line between antic/farce and an idea? Between charlatans and posthumous geniuses? Is it not the duty of rascals and harlequins to question and comment the status quo? Aren't the jesters the only instance at a court, that hold up a mirro

Where is the line between antic/farce and an idea? Between charlatans and posthumous geniuses? Is it not the duty of rascals and harlequins to question and comment the status quo? Aren't the jesters the only instance at a court, that hold up a mirror to the prevalence(d)? To motivate others to think about? Did they fail with it? Does a designed-narrative collapse exist?